PEDAGOGICAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59417/nir.2012.1.43Keywords:
sustainable development, ecological culture, ecological policy, ecological practice, ecological education.Abstract
The place and importance of educational institutions as a context of sustainable development is determined by their ecological perspective, that is, the perspective of future development within the framework of the humane concept at all levels of the ecological structure. The paper presents schemes of the educational ecological environment based on the theory of system structure. 1. Bronfenbrenner, which represents the theoretical framework of the work. Orientation towards the aftr-mative associations of sustainable development in education implies a high level of competences of holistic-eco-ecological culture. The construct of a society based on knowledge and the imperative principle "in the modern world, change is the norm" imposed the need to consider the basic issues of the ecological education paradigm, through commitment to early education for sustainable development, continuity of education at all levels of the education system and stronger inclusion of educational institutions in the process of lifelong learning for sustainable development. The dimensions of the so-called "ecological triangle" activities, which represent an important element for structuring sustainable development at the level of all elements of the educational structure of the system are: creation of ecological culture, creation of ecological policy and development of ecological practice. The structure of goals within the dimensions of the triangle of sustainable development is determined by the outcomes that ensure the future-oriented development of the institution, children and adults, with a strategy of achievement through education.
References
Andevski, M., Kundačina, M. (2004). Ekološko obrazovanje: od brige za okoliš do održivog razvoja.
Užice: Učiteljski fakultet.
Bredekamp, S. (1996). Kako djecu odgajati. Zagreb: Educa.
Bruner, J. (2000). Kultura obrazovanja. Zagreb: Educa.
Bronfenbrener, J. (1997). Ekologija ljudskog razvoja. Beograd: Zavod za udžbenike i nastavna sredstva . Cvjetićanin S. (2009). Metode rada u nastavi poznavanja prirode. Sombor: Pedagoški fakultet.
Cvjetićanin, S., Sučević, V. (2011). Teorijski okvir razvoja pojmova o prirodi dece u predškolskoj ustanovi. Pedagogija, br.3.
European Communites (2001). Environment 2010: Our Future, Our Choice, Luxenburg: Office for Offi-cal Publications of the Eoropean Communites.
Goleman, D. (2010). Ekološka inteligencija. Beograd: Geopoetika.
Hansen, A.K., Kaufmann, K.R. and Walsh, K.B. (2001). Kreiranje vaspitno-obrazovnog procesa u kome dete ima centralnu ulogu. Beograd: Centar za interaktivnu pedagogiju.
Kamenov, E. (1999). Predškolska pedagogija. Beograd: ZUNS.
Kami, K. (1992). Skica programa za predškolsko obrazovanje izrađena na osnovu Pijažeove teorije. Predškolsko dete, br. 4.
Klemenović, J. (2009). Savremeni predškolski programi. Novi Sad: Savez pedagoških društava Vojvodine.
Koritnik, M. (1983). 2000 igara. Beograd: Zavod za izdavanje udžbenika. Sarajevo: Svjetlost.
Levkov, Lj. (1985). Ekološka dečjapsihologija. Beograd: ZZUINS.
Marendić, Z. (2009). Teorijski okvir razvoja matematičkih pojmova u dječijem vrtiću. Metodika, vol. 10. Nikolić,V. (2003). Obrazovanje i zaštita životne sredine. Beograd: Zadužbina Andrejević.
Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment (PCE) (2004.). See Change: Learning and education for sustainability. Wellington: PCE.
Pavlović, V. (2011). Univerzitet i održivi razvoj. Beograd: Fakultet političkih nauka, Centar za ekološku politiku i održivi razvoj pedagogijske društvo.
Počuča, N., Aranđelović, S., Hotva, Z. (2005). Zaštita životne sredine-upravljanje komunalnim otpadom. Beograd: Privredni pregled.
Polić, M. (1995). Ekohistorijski pristup problemu zaštite okoliša. Društvena istraživanja, 2 (22): 457-471.
Slunjski, E. (2001). Integrirani predškolski kurikulum — rad djece na projektima. Zagreb: Mali profesor.
Srdić, V. (2009). Predškolska ustanova kao kontekst razvoja romske dece i roditelja putem modelovanja inkluzivnog obrazovanja kroz nivoe sistemske strukture. Az Eselyegyenloseg es a felzdrkoztatds vetiiletei az oktatdsban. 3. Integralas, felzarkoztatas, eselyegyenloseg, MTTK, Szabadka: 233 -242.
Stojaković, P. (1981). Razvijanje sposobnosti učenja. Sarajevo: Svijetlost, str. 81.
Sain, M., Topić, S., Đaković, N., Božić, D. i Galić, B. (2001). Kako pripremamo dijete za polazak u školu. Banja Luka: Centar za predškolsko vaspitanje i obrazovanje.
Soljan, N. (2007). Taksonomija svjetskih razvoja u obrazovanju prema (de)konstrukciji pedagogije. U: V. Previšić, N. Soljan, N. Hrvatić (ur.). Pedagogija prema cjdoživotnom obrazovanju i društvu znanja (str. 411-440). Zagreb.
The Brundtland Report, Our Common Future (1987.), http://www.undocuments.net/wced-ocf.htm (15. 10. 2008.).
Wood, D. (1995). Kako djeca misle i uče. Zagreb: Educa.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2012 NIR
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
